Bush is troubled – troubled he says, about the dire fate of an Afghan convert to Christianity. Now Bush is rarely troubled and isn’t known to be aware that the rosy picture he paints of the new Afghanistan isn’t exactly the hard edge realism one gets from a photograph. He tells us that women are liberated, girls are going to school, the Taliban is gone and it’s all about Democracy in action. That, as well as most of what issues from God’s Own Party, should long since have made us aware that a partial picture is a kind of lie.
Afghanis voted, according to the propaganda we receive, for a constitution that guarantees religious freedom. The Afghan constitution provides death for those who exercise freedom of belief.
"I look forward to working with the government of that country to make sure that people are protected in their capacity to worship" says George. I believe him, but I don’t believe he’ll be playing up the point that if Afghanistan is to be restrained from hacking off the heads of infidels, change will not result from an internal Democratic process, but from the military might of an occupying power with a secular constitution. Afghanistan has no separation of religious power from Governmental power and that is something George has to render blurry and out of focus.
Abdul Rahman has been a practicing Christian for 16 years and the new US backed government, basking in the democratic light of freedom wants to kill him for it. Their government, it seems, takes the same position as the religious right in the US: that law is based on received scripture and so should have the same power. It’s a prescription for the same old horror the West once had and the East has yet to get rid of.
So when they tell you the Taliban is gone, it’s not the story. They are still there, just over the border, like part of a cancer that the surgeon didn’t get all of. Their program was only a bit more tyrannical and draconian than what obtains in “free” Afghanistan. The country is under the heel of malicious mullahs and drug lords and the government is held together by the military power of infidels. The story, just outside the edges of the photograph is very different from what the photographer wants you to see.
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
The hypocrisy and contradictions are astounding.
The article does point out that the Candaian, Italians, Germans and Americans (representatives, etc) are all expressing outrage that troops of all faiths are dying (literally) in support of this ambiguios constitution that on the one hand gaurantees religious freedom but on the other hand supports this archiac interpretation of islamic law. It'll be interesting to see how (or even if) Bush reacts and how this all plays out. Nice post!
And now clerics there say even if they let him off people should just kill him anyway. Nice people.
How did that guy survive the Taliban only to be chased down by the American-created government? Something is funny with the story.
Ha apparently only returned to Kabul in 2002, having lived in Germany. The surprising thing, to me, is that there is so much popular support for "pulling him apart so that there is nothing left"
They are afraid that if he's allowed to go into exile, too many others will flee the country, so despite Karzai's fear of American wrath, they seem to want him beheaded or worse.
Yes sir, elections mean freedom. Just as Bush says, Kabul is just like Philadelphia in the 1780's.
So, he went back thinking he would find "democracy" and was welcomed with less than open arms?
I guess. Funny how democracy and freedom are such different concepts.
Hey - I was born in Philadelphia. ;)
But sometime after 1789, right? ;-)>
Post a Comment