Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Our newest ambassador

One of the weaknesses of our normally peaceful presidential change of watch is that someone like Bush, leaving office peacefully, with ceremony and not in handcuffs, isn't an event that shows the world we have attempted to cleanse ourselves of his administration and its arrogance. Regardless of who his replacement will be, it will be hard to convince the world that our government has any respect for basic human rights, justice or the rule of law.

Newly released Al Jazeera cameraman Sami al Hajj returned to his native Sudan Monday to begin his new mission of United States bad will ambassador to the world. He was held in our Guantanamo prison camp without charge for seven years, apparently because he contributed money to a charity suspected of supporting terrorists, once interviewed Osama bin Laden and worked for a beverage company whose director supported Muslim forces in Bosnia and Chechnya. After seven years, or as he put it in a televised speech, "After 2,340 days spent in the most heinous prison mankind has ever known" he was released. Was this vengeance for his having reported human rights violations in Afghanistan? Maybe, but if this kind of evidence can justify seven years of enhanced interrogation, nobody the US targets for reprisals is safe and of course the world knows it, hates us for it and hates us the more for our not caring, for nattering endlessly about flag pins, what brand of whiskey is preferred and other insanely meaningless crap.

It will take a long time for the image of the US as a dangerous country run by paranoid megalomaniacs and peopled by cowardly, greedy entertainment junkies who have no clue or care, to fade. Who knows if it ever will? Who knows if we ever will be able to get clean of the addiction to diseased patriotism, ignorance and delusions of grandeur, but if we won't Punish, Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and the entire cabal, perhaps the election of Barak Obama will to some degree signal that a change has occurred in America. Without that perception, ambassadors like Sami al Hajj will unite the world against us and ignite the passions of ten thousand terrorists. We can chose to become an isolated nation dependent upon the fear of our nuclear weapons for protection, or we can begin to reverse course, to live again as free and courageous people who deal with the world honestly.

Our choices are very limited and there is no perfect candidate, but for my part, I think Barak Obama, whatever his faults and weaknesses may be, is the best choice we have.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ditto, he is our only choice. He is proving to be thick skinned.

He will need it since we have to drive tough discussions, and wake up to harsh realities.

He will bring the tough items to the forefront, and will take serious lumps, but he won't shy away from the discussions.

MrSleep

Capt. Fogg said...

Yes, and he seems to provide reasonable and calm responses to the idiotic accusations hurled at him.

Intellectual Insurgent said...

It's amazing what a number the neocons are doing on him. One must wonder what they are afraid of.

RR said...

I agree - I think Barak is about our best option.

I like that fact that he comes from a middle-class background -- spent time living abroad -- and worked in the Chicago community after Harvard law.

Not to mention he seems to stay focused on his message and undistracted by most of the craziness flung at him...

Anonymous said...

II (aka, "Mommy"), they are afraid of losing out on the gravy train, and if the corruption ever truly comes to light it, a few folks should end up in prison.

MrSleep

Intellectual Insurgent said...

Hopefully, Barak has something up his sleeve. All his boot-licking to AIPAC makes me wonder if we will be in for more of the same.

d nova said...

right on, obama! unlike remaining opponents, only he's shown n continues 2 show sound judgment + integrity on real issues like war n gas tax holiday. he cd've been better on jeremiah wright, but nobody's perfect, n that's more personal than public.

note that 2day gops started new anti-obama website:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/09/rnc-launches-new-anti-obama-site/

mustn't get overconfident. scum still tends 2 rise 2 the top.

question is, how do we stop bush-cheney-like abuses fro happening again?

i think we need 2 start by setting an xample: impeachment may b out o the question; indictment after leaving office is not. if we don't do it here, i wdn't b srprised if some other country or the intl court does. if so, i'm 4 xtradition.