There’s little doubt that no one has clear title to
Something is going to change and it may be rather soon; perhaps as soon as Rumsfeld can fashion a fitting euphemism for “cut and Run” and an Orwellian synonym for Victory. The growing disgust with and declining support for Bush’s War coupled with our lack of control over the occupied countries and their puppet “democracies” makes it inevitable.
It has been argued by some that the original “Neoconservative” intent of the invasion of
The obstinate insistence upon using the absolute minimum of US forces in Iraq as well as the refusal to plan for an occupation gives weight to the argument for planned failure and although Bush insists that the Army was given all the troops it asked for, it does appear that only select generals were allowed to ask. Those who wanted to apply overwhelming force and to have a detailed plan for occupation are no longer employed.
Even though the Administration’s pet General Peter Pace tells us that Rumsfeld’s Inspiration comes directly from God’s lips, the odds are that God will reveal a new plan unto Don that will remind those of us who dabble in history of the British partitioning of the area in the early 20th century. The Kurds may get the
The Republicans after all have much to fear if they cannot stop the fighting. It may no longer be good enough to blame a withdrawal on hippies and Michael Moore and Bill Clinton. It has to look like a victory and it has to be soon; before the more traditional minority in the party throws out the neocons and the religious right and the crooks and incompetents and perverts and begins to refocus on restoring Habeas Corpus, an independent judiciary; on stopping the wild borrowing spree and restoring the checks and balances that have preserved some degree of liberty for over two centuries.
4 comments:
The more I read about the division of Iraq into its natural 3 nations the less I convince myself that this will quell the violence there. They all want the petrodollars, the major cities are not homogenous, especially Baghdad, so short of forced relocations, that quagmire won't be calmed absent the strong arm of an omnipotent thug (a la Saddam). The Shi'a state would be swallowed up by Iran. Turkey would resist a recognized Kurdistan in the strongest possible forms. So what is the answer? These are the questions that regional experts on the area would have asked the administration prior to the initial illegal invasion, if it had occurred to George and Dick to ask someone in the know. Yikes.
It may come to forced relocations - that's what the Brits did in India and two million people died. I didn't say it was a good solution, but it may be what they've had in mind all along.
By the way, I apologise for the Blogger problem. This post has been appearing and disappearing and multiplying all morning. I hope they fix it soon.
I’ve been sounding this horn for a couple years now: our actions are more likely to create a state more sympathetic to Iran than to the west.
Rumsfeld is incompetent – as is the rest of this administration. It seems to me it doesn’t matter whether or not you supported the invasion – it has been botched beyond belief: both in terms of troop numbers and post-invasion reconstruction. Any sensible person would want those accountable for the decisions fired.
But not conservatives: they pile excuse onto excuse… Somehow it gets a little traction with the public even tho the conservative hold the executive and legislative branch in a death grip.
I hope you are right – I hope these idiots change course: if for no other reason than to save the lives of American troops.
I have a feeling - just a feeling - that the lives of American troops mean very little to the Washington Warlords.
Post a Comment