Well there you have it. No more conjecture about Harriet Meyers and why she was nominated. According to an AP report a few minutes ago. On an April 1989 questionnaire sent out by the Texans United for Life group, she checked “yes” to the question "If Congress passes a Human Life Amendment to the Constitution that would prohibit abortion except when it was necessary to prevent the death of the mother, would you actively support its ratification by the Texas Legislature,"
She checked “yes” for the question about whether she would use her influence to keep "pro-abortion" people off city health boards and commissions.
Of course this is not exactly the same as asking whether she would rule against Roe Vs Wade in any specific case, the question of whether she opposes abortion rights is answered: Yes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Since she's never been married and has no kids, she either hasn't had sex, had sex without birth control, with birth control or had an abortion. Any guesses?
Wonder what her position is on abstinence only? Probably missionary.
If you look at any of the Crony Corps, their past is a designer product and it can be designed to suit any purpose. I'm sure that regardless of her sexual history, she's a virgin according to the official hagiography.
Seriously guys, that heffer is UGLY as sin. Unless Curious George shared the Crown Jewels with her, it's plausible she's an untouched flower. If a woman was as devoted to my husband as Harriet Miers is to Bush, I would be weary to say the least.
George seems to be a bit of a pied piper when it comes to women of a certain age who have perhaps sacrificed close relationships for most of their lives. Condi comes to mind - and her faux pas about referring to George as her husband at a dinner party.
Perhaps as with another really bad president, Warren G. Harding, Bush is more than a close friend to several women.
Anyway, if the saw about people over 50 getting the face they deserve is true, maybe the ugly is more than skin deep.
Post a Comment