Thursday, September 15, 2005
Like a Rock
The Pledge of Allegiance is like a rock. Turning it over exposes all kinds of nasty things you’d rather not see. Fortunately for Bush and his gang of thieves, the mandatory recital for school children is again under attack. The last time there was a perceived threat to the Eisenhower Pledge which effectively instituted a mandatory religious oath in direct defiance of the Constitution, half the vehicles on my local streets appeared with “Under God” painted or stickered on the windows and bodywork.
Of course the power hungry religious supremacists immediately went to work inventing a vast atheistic conspiracy to make our various religions illegal, although some religious denominations, particularly the Jews, also took some flack in the local papers. (We know who you are and we’re going to deal with you, opined one editorial contributor) Once again, it’s apparent that there is nothing that brings out the animal in Man like Religion.
Sadly, our educational level being what it is, there is some confusion about when the nation’s founding documents were written and 1954 must seem to be close enough to make Eisenhower’s nod to the Christian Right an expression of the founding fathers’ sentiments. After decades of active mythologizing, few seem to recognize that the need to make oaths either as a requirement for citizenship or office was anathema and is illegal. This is why we are told by Liars for the Lord that the Constitution is really secondary to and dependent upon the Bible.
The need for communal belief and the need to suppress the infidel was not on the mind of Jefferson, Madison, Franklin or Washington, no matter what the various TV religion channels tell you every day and a thousand times on Sunday. The attempt to establish monotheism as a State belief is expressly forbidden, as is the requirement that anyone, whether school teacher or President, profess a belief in order to participate in civic matters. It’s hard to see the oath of allegiance to a Nation “Under God” as anything other than such a requirement.
There are several reasons to object to requiring ritual invocations of children in the public schools. Indeed there are many genuinely religious folk who object to invoking God on matters of politics or other vanities. But of course the kind of Republic that Jefferson envisioned is unstable at best in a country where the ignorant are so easily employed as soldiers of authoritarianism and such is the land we live in. So perhaps when we finally become a Religious Republic, like the Nations of 18th century Europe we were founded to oppose, someone will be able to enjoy the irony – in private of course.
For the time being, one nation under God makes a great smokescreen for three states under water.
Have a look at Blunderford's humorous take on this
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
s Jon Stewart said we added "under god" in the 1950s because we were fighting the godless commies in the cold war and wanted to show our connection to religion. Now we are are in a fight with religious fanatics and we want to show what exactly? Adherence to a "more reasonable god?"
Jesus '08
Yes, it was necessary also to tie Jesus to capitalism to obscure the pinko statements he made about giving all you own to the poor and sick. Today's authorized Jesus is more concerned with whether Paul Alen's 300 foot megayacht gets taxed when he tries to cram his camel through the eye of a needle.
Will Paul Allen be able to ride to heavan in his yacht? And I saw a David Copperfield walk through a wall so I'm sure he can get a camel through the eye of a needle.
Let's not forget about the relatively recent national motto. I don't think the founding fathers would be pleased if they found out they shared their place on US currency with state sponsored religion. From the Treasury:
"A law passed by the 84th Congress (P.L. 84-140) and approved by the President on July 30, 1956, the President approved a Joint Resolution of the 84th Congress, declaring IN GOD WE TRUST the national motto of the United States. IN GOD WE TRUST was first used on paper money in 1957, when it appeared on the one-dollar silver certificate."
Also, FWIW, do the neocons still use the term "pinko" to describe the left? I thought the corporate media changed the Republican party to red and the Dems to blue. So now, the neocons would appear to be the ones who are pink.
I actually haven't heard Pinko for a while - I just thought it evoked the 50's witch hunt which is a bit like our current witch hunt.
Indeed too many people think the 1950's and the 1780's are all the same in terms of "traditional Values" Having God on the money doesn't seem to bother the religious right though, even though it gave Jesus fits and is forbidden by the Ten Commandments.
I long ago gave up the idea that these people make any sense - all I can do is laugh.
It's all a matter of perspective. For the uber-religious right wingnuts (URRW)who believe in Intelligent Design and the fact that the earth is only 6 or so thousand years old (according to the bible), thinking that the 1950s are roughly the same as the 1780s isn't really a far stretch for them. I'd say "Let's Do The Time Warp Again" but I'm sure the URRW have never seen the Rocky Horror Picture Show. ; )
The Republican Horror Picture Show is now playing at a theatre near you!
I don't think there'a any dount that the idea of indoctrinating kids with blind patriotism or blind love of a symbol was there before the God business was added. I find it a bit revolting, because it works. There's never more flag waving and patriotic persecution than when this country does something reprehensible. If they have to brianwash kids, it would be better to have them pledge allegiance to the Constitution and its principles, but the people who want allegiance want obedience to authority.
Post a Comment